Land Use Controls: Public Power and Private Agreement
Zoning classifications, variance standards, subdivision procedure, and environmental and coastal review are creatures of state statute and local ordinance. Nothing on this page substitutes for your own jurisdiction's rules or the state-portion outline in your exam vendor's current candidate handbook.
Ownership of land has never meant unlimited freedom to use it. Two separate systems narrow what an owner may do: rules government imposes on everyone in an area, and promises recorded in the chain of title by owners and developers themselves. They are created differently, enforced by different parties, and answered differently on the exam.
This page lays out both systems, the ways an owner can seek relief from a public rule, and the order in which to study the material so the similar-sounding terms stop collapsing into each other.
Where Land Use Limits Come From
The public side rests on four governmental powers that every candidate is expected to be able to name and distinguish: police power, eminent domain, taxation, and escheat. Police power is the broad authority to regulate for public health, safety and welfare, and it is what zoning, building codes and subdivision regulation are built on. Eminent domain is the power to take property for a public use, which the constitution conditions on just compensation. Taxation supports government and, unpaid, ripens into a lien against the parcel. Escheat returns property to the state when an owner dies with no will and no heirs.
The private side rests on agreement. A developer records a declaration of covenants before selling lots; an owner grants a neighbor an easement; parties to a deed write a restriction into it. These bind successive owners because they run with the land and appear in the record a buyer is charged with examining. They are contracts in origin and property interests in effect.
The practical consequence, and the one exam items keep returning to, is that the two systems stack rather than cancel. A covenant may forbid what the ordinance permits, and the owner is bound by the covenant. An ordinance may forbid what the covenant permits, and the owner is bound by the ordinance. Whichever limit is stricter governs conduct, but each is enforced only by the party who holds it: the municipality enforces its code, and owners or their association enforce the declaration.
One rule cuts across both systems. A restriction that discriminates on the basis of a class protected by fair housing law is unenforceable, whether it sits in an old recorded declaration or in a municipal practice. Age of the document does not rescue it, and the fact that it is still physically printed in the record does not make it operative.
The Public Toolkit, Term by Term
These are the instruments government uses. Learn who acts, what the instrument does, and whether money changes hands.
Comprehensive plan. The long-range policy document a locality adopts for growth, circulation and land use. Zoning is supposed to implement it, which is why a rezoning that contradicts the plan and benefits a single parcel is vulnerable as spot zoning.
Zoning ordinance. Divides the jurisdiction into districts and sets permitted uses, bulk, height, setback, lot coverage and density for each. It is the instrument that answers what may be built here.
Building and housing codes. Construction and occupancy standards enforced through permits and inspection, ending in a certificate of occupancy. A use can be permitted by zoning and still barred from occupancy by code.
Subdivision regulation. Governs how raw land becomes recorded lots: plat approval, street and utility standards, and dedication of public areas. It answers how lots come into existence rather than what goes on them.
Eminent domain and condemnation. The power and the court proceeding that exercises it. Just compensation is generally market value; when only part of a parcel is taken, severance damages to the remainder may be part of the award. Inverse condemnation is the mirror image, brought by an owner who says regulation went so far it amounted to a taking.
Environmental and resource regulation. Wetlands, floodplain, coastal, historic district and hazardous materials review sit on top of ordinary zoning and are administered by separate agencies at several levels of government. Identify the layer before you answer which body grants permission.
The Private Toolkit, Term by Term
These limits originate with owners and developers. Courts, not code officials, resolve disputes about them.
Restrictive covenants and CC and Rs. Promises about use, appearance or construction recorded against a subdivision or common interest community. Remedy is normally an injunction, and unreasonable delay in complaining can cost an owner the right to enforce.
Deed restrictions. A limit written into a particular conveyance. Functionally similar to a covenant, narrower in reach, and read closely because the exam likes items where the restriction binds one parcel rather than a whole tract.
Easements. A non-possessory right to use another's land. Appurtenant easements attach to a neighboring parcel and pass with it, naming a dominant and a servient tenement. Easements in gross belong to a person or a company, which is the form utility lines take. Creation may be by express grant or reservation, by necessity, by implication, by prescription, or by condemnation.
Licenses and profits. A license is mere permission, personal and revocable, which is precisely how it differs from an easement. A profit is the right to remove something from the land, such as timber or minerals.
Encroachment. A physical intrusion across a boundary, such as a wall, fence or eave. It is found by survey rather than by title search, and it is a trespass problem rather than a recorded right, although long-standing intrusions can mature into rights under state law.
Adverse possession and dedication. Transfers that happen without a willing grant. Adverse possession requires possession that meets statutory conditions for a statutory period; dedication is the transfer of private land to public use, frequently through an approved subdivision plat.
Three Doors Out of a Zoning Restriction
When a proposed use does not fit the district, exam items offer three routes, and candidates who have not separated them lose the item no matter how well they know zoning generally.
The first is the nonconforming use, and it is not applied for at all. The use was lawful when established and was made nonconforming by a later ordinance, so it continues by right. Local rules then restrict enlarging it, rebuilding after major destruction and resuming it after a lapse, and those restrictions differ considerably from place to place.
The second is the variance. It is a request for permission to depart from a dimensional or use requirement because of hardship rooted in the parcel itself, such as an odd shape, a steep grade or an undersized frontage. A board of appeals hears it against criteria the ordinance sets. Two facts sink most variance applications: a hardship the applicant created, and a hardship that amounts only to a smaller profit.
The third is the conditional use, also called a special use or special exception. Here the ordinance already lists the use as acceptable in the district provided stated conditions are met, which is how schools, houses of worship, day care and clinics typically appear in residential districts. Nothing is being excused; a listed condition is being verified. Summarized: nonconforming use is a right from history, a variance is relief from the rule, and a conditional use is compliance with the rule.
How to Sequence the Study Block
Start with the four government powers and the three private instruments, written out once in your own words with who creates and who enforces each. Do that before touching practice questions. Land use items are sorting problems, and sorting is impossible until the categories exist.
Next, build the pairs the exam habitually contrasts: regulation against taking, variance against conditional use, easement against license, easement against encroachment, zoning against subdivision regulation, covenant against ordinance. Six comparisons cover a large share of what gets asked.
Then add the calculations. Lot area, setback and frontage measurement, density and acreage conversion are arithmetic, not doctrine, and they are the cheapest points available on this topic once the conversions are automatic.
Only after that should you open your state's material, and when you do, read for numbers and named bodies: which board hears variances, what standard the statute states, how long a nonconforming use may be discontinued, which agency reviews wetlands. RE License Prep keeps separate state banks for all 50 states and DC on both the salesperson and broker tracks so that layer does not get studied from a national source. The free diagnostic shows whether land use even belongs in your priority list, and full access is $79 one time with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
Land Use Questions Candidates Ask
If zoning allows something and a covenant forbids it, which one wins?
The owner is bound by both, so in practice the stricter limit controls what can actually be done. Zoning permission is the government declining to object; it is not permission to break a private promise recorded against the land. Enforcement stays with whoever holds the restriction, meaning neighbors or the association go to court over the covenant while the municipality has no role in it.
Why does a zoning change require no compensation when a taking does?
They rest on different powers. Zoning is police power, which regulates use for public welfare and leaves title with the owner. Eminent domain acquires an interest, and the constitution conditions that acquisition on just compensation. The boundary case is regulation so severe that an owner claims it has effectively taken the property, which is litigated as inverse condemnation and decided on standards that come from case law rather than from a simple rule.
What is the difference between an easement and a license?
An easement is an interest in land. It is normally created in writing, it is recorded, it survives a sale of the servient parcel, and it cannot simply be called off by the owner who granted it. A license is bare permission: personal to the holder, revocable by the owner, and gone when the land is sold. Exam items signal a license with casual permission between neighbors and an easement with a recorded document.
Does a nonconforming use last forever?
Not necessarily. The right protects what was lawfully in place, and local ordinances commonly bar enlarging the use, rebuilding it after substantial destruction, changing it to a different nonconforming use, or resuming it after a period of discontinuance. Some jurisdictions also phase certain uses out over time. The conditions and any time limits come from the local ordinance, so read your jurisdiction's rather than assuming a number.
How are land use questions usually written?
As short situations rather than definitions. You will be given a party, an action and a limit, and asked to name the instrument, identify who may enforce it, or say what the party must apply for. That is why memorized definitions underperform here: recognizing the word is not the same as placing the situation.
Do old discriminatory covenants still have effect?
No. Restrictions that discriminate against a class protected under fair housing law are unenforceable, and courts will not give effect to them. Such language sometimes remains physically present in old recorded documents, and states have adopted procedures for removing or disclaiming it, but its continued presence on paper does not make it binding on anyone.
Where to go next: Related Pages
Pay once, study your state, sit the exam ready
One state, $79, no subscription. The free diagnostic shows where you stand before you pay.
Access opens immediately after checkout, and every purchase carries a 30-day money-back guarantee.